What "leading" a round actually means

Hey!! You’ve made it to issue #116 of the VC Demystified newsletter. To access the 100+ other venture capital guides I’ve written, go here.

When people outside of VC hear "we led the round," they think it just means we wrote the biggest check in the round.

That's part of it (usually), but there’s more to it.

Your role as a VC and what you do day-to-day looks very different when you join a firm that leads all/most of their rounds versus one that only participates. And almost nobody explains that difference to people trying to break into this industry.

So here's the breakdown of 4 ways it changes your day job as a VC:

Lead investor: the firm that sets the terms of the round. They negotiate the valuation, write the term sheet (or heavily shape it), commit the largest check (usually), and typically take a board seat (if it’s a priced round).

Participant (or "follow"): everyone else in the round. They accept the terms the lead negotiated, write a smaller check, and usually don't get a board seat or a formal governance role.

Simple enough on paper but important to know how this ladders into your day job.

If you lead, you spend much more time on diligence usually. You are doing the deep dive work on the founders, the product and the market. You are the one that ultimately prices the round off of that information. If you join a fund that leads, diligence is a big part of the job.

Participant’s diligence piggy backs off of the lead’s diligence usually. You are just verify that you like the founder and market enough to move fast into a round.

Participant diligence can happen in days. Lead diligence can take weeks.

Ok here's one people never think about until they're actually in the seat.

If you're mostly participating and not leading, a huge chunk of your job is just sourcing. Founder intro calls, all day, every day. You're not setting terms or running point on the deal, so the way you add value (and justify your seat at the fund) is by seeing enough companies and writing enough small checks into other people's rounds.

That means way higher deal volume and less diligence work. You might take 8-10 first calls a week just to land a handful of investments a year. It's a numbers game, and you get good fast at pattern matching in a 30 minute call.

If you're trying to figure out what kind of seat you actually want: love the thrill of always meeting new founders and new ideas? A participate-heavy fund is genuinely more fun day to day. Want fewer, deeper relationships instead of a huge funnel? You want a fund that leads.